The road to hell in the form of global warming and peak oil could, sadly, be paved with good intentions, as a report in this week’s Washington Post indicates.
The newspaper reports that its analysis of U.S. records shows the federal government’s efforts to move toward a national fleet of vehicles powered by alternative fuels have backfired, actually leading to an increased use of fossil fuels and higher greenhouse gas emissions.
How on Earth could that happen? Apparently, it’s not a good idea to start driving flex-fuel vehicles in places where ethanol-based fuel is not yet available.
Here’s the setup: the U.S. Congress a few years back required federal agencies to gradually begin increasing the number of flex-fuel vehicles in their fleets. They did so, but often ended up having to power those vehicles with old-fashioned petrol because they were nowhere near an ethanol pump.
The result, according to the Post analysis: more than 92 percent of the fuel used by flex-fuel fleets continues to be standard gasoline. And, because flex-fuel engines tend to be larger and less fuel-efficient than regular ones, the fleets used up more petrol and emitted more greenhouse gases than they would have otherwise.
The Post quotes Jim Kliesch, a senior engineer with the environmental group Union of Concerned Scientists, as saying, “This is an example of a law that has had a perversely different effect than what was originally intended.”
Another way to put it might be, “No good deed goes unpunished.”
1 Comment
mus302
This is the age old chicken and egg scenario. Without vehicles on the road there would be no reason for stations to add E85 pumps. And without E85 pumps there would be no reason for manufacturers to produce flex fueled vehicles. Knowing this the government took it upon themselves to provide a market for the vehicles giving the manufacturers a reason to produce them. This has also spurred the development of over 1800 E85 locations.
The one thing the article doesn’t point out is that the UL suspended certification of E85 pumps a couple of years ago even though there had been no reported problems. About a year ago the UL released standards for new E85 pumps but as of yet hasn’t fished testing and certified any pumps for use with E85. This has slowed the deployment of E85 pumps greatly.
Comments are closed.